|
Concept of universal health
care
relic from Communism!
Edward C.
Noonan
Dear Yuba County
American Independent Party
members:
It is my opinion that the
BarryO healthcare scheme is nothing more than
enforcement of the 32nd plank of the Communist
Manifesto:
32.
Support any socialist movement to give centralized
control over any part of the culture--education,
social agencies, welfare programs, mental health
clinics, etc.
Please watch this
video (The Lemon), then read the
following article on the Communist-styled Health
care in
Canada:
Concept of universal health
care relic from Communism
Issue date: 5/14/04
Section: Ed-Op
Media Credit: The
Triangle
| |
Universal
health care is one of the worst ideas of all
time.
Universal health care is a system
by which tax money is used to give health care for
everyone who doesn't have it via a job or some
other means. To put it in more realistic terms, it
means that hardworking people who pay taxes are
required to pay for a huge number of irresponsible
people, a huge number of vain or hypochondriac
people and a small handful of people who genuinely
need help.
Universal health care does
nothing more than punish reasonable people for the
excesses of others. Why should I, a young man who
stays in somewhat decent shape, smokes and drinks
only in moderation and eats more or less correctly
be required to pay the hospital bills for people
who are too lazy to exercise, too weak-willed to
resist the siren call of a triple whopper with
cheese three times a day, too addicted to break
their smoking, drinking, or narcotic habits, or
too clumsy to prepare a bagel without accidentally
amputating a finger?
Obviously, not all
medical expenses are accrued through a person
being negligent or acting recklessly. Sometimes,
fate and nature conspire to visit disease upon
people. Bear in mind, however, that according to
the National Center for Health Statistics, in 2001
there were 193,000 emergency room incidents
directly related to cocaine overdoses. 509,000
people were sent to the emergency room for
attempted suicides or self-inflicted wounds
(30,600 died.) In that same year, 67,100 people
were diagnosed with cancer. This also includes
preventable cancers, such as lung cancer that is a
direct result of tobacco use. More
people are sent to the hospital because of the
abuse they give their own bodies than for all
other reasons combined.
The fact of the matter is that more
people fall ill or injure themselves through their
own irresponsibility than don't. If a person ever
came up to you and said that their years of
chain-smoking have had a negative effect on their
health, and that you are the one who should pay
for the treatment, you'd laugh at them. That's why
the entire premise of universal health care is
ridiculous. The Constitution is quite clear on two
subjects. First, that the sins of the father shall
not be laid on the son; in other words, only the
person who has done a wrong shall pay for a crime.
Second, that collective punishment for one
person's actions is absolutely not allowed. That
one's even in the Geneva Convention.
Yet this is exactly what universal health
care aims to do. It aims to put the burden of one
person's irresponsible actions on the shoulders of
another. It aims to make the collective whole
responsible for something that they might not have
done. Universal health care is a great idea if the
world were a perfect place where injury and
illness came only from the cruel hand of fate; in
the real world, however, it is absolutely,
categorically and unequivocally wrong. Universal
health care is in direct opposition to what it
means to be a freedom-loving, Geneva
Convention-abiding, moral, decent human being.
Let's pretend for a moment that the very
concept of an American universal health care
system wasn't fundamentally flawed. That's a
pretty tall order, and I dare say that it would be
less ridiculous to pretend we were all magical
flying unicorns, but never mind that.
There
are some health care providers that cover the
expenses of women who get abortions. Therefore,
adopting a system of universal health care forces
everyone in the country who pays taxes to pay for
abortions. In America, women have the right to
choose. This may be a good thing or a bad thing,
but let's be clear: This means they have the right
to choose credit or cash when they pay for it.
They do not have the right to choose "Aaron
Sakulich's tax money" when asked how they will pay
for it. Religious beliefs aside, it's just a
matter of honor; a man should not pay for a
woman's abortion unless his penis was somehow
personally involved.
Abortions are just one
of the many problems. Some health care plans pay
at least partially for plastic surgery. Some pay
for medical marijuana, in places where that's
legal. I personally don't think someone should cut
their face open just if they've got a big nose
they don't like. I also think that marijuana,
though unparalleled in its ability to give one the
munchies, has some problems, and I'd prefer my tax
dollars not go to giving prescription bongs to
hippies on the other side of the continent. Why
should I, clocking in on the high end of "normal
weight," pay for the stomach staples for a man who
can neither stop eating Whoppers Deluxe nor spend
part of his day anywhere but parked in front of a
TV? I
shouldn't, and that is why universal health care
is morally repugnant.
Universal health care is so riddled with
problems, both in the fundamental theory behind it
and in its practical application, that it is
absolutely unsuitable for any sort of wide-scale,
real-world applications. Cuba has universal health
care; one cannot buy things like aspirin or
laxatives anywhere on the island. Canada has taken
a good swing at universal health care, and while
basic services such as setting of bones and buying
drugs are excellent, more advanced services such
as organ transplants and chemotherapy can take
years to come through. If you need an organ,
waiting several years is generally difficult at
best. Every Canadian I've ever met who has had a
loved one fall seriously ill has nothing but bad
words for their system of medicine. These
countries have had decades to get universal health
care to work; it isn't going to happen.
Our health care system is surely not
perfect, but this insane, naïve plan to ignore
everything we know about human nature is no
solution. After a year with universal health care,
there will be such a rush on hospitals and
courtrooms that our legal system will be paralyzed
and the tax rate will be 100 percent. It will be
nothing short of communism.
It all boils
down to the fact that universal health care will
take the tax dollars of the people and put them to
uses, such as abortion, that those people disagree
with on some deep philosophical or religious
level. Even ignoring this fatal flaw, in a country
where choosing to smoke, people driving like jerks
and hamburger-related heart diseases send more
people to the hospital than all other causes added
together and multiplied by a hundred, it is
absolutely and unquestionably wrong to punish the
innocent for the irresponsibility of the guilty.
If this were a system of "take from the rich, give
to the poor," it might have some merit to it, but
a system of "rob from
everyone and give to the irresponsible, the
hypochondriac and the ignorant, and if we have
some left over, to the poor" is
obviously fundamentally and fatally flawed.
Aaron Sakulich is a junior
majoring in materials
engineering.
<end>
BOYCOTT THE
CESSPOOL,
|